Skip to content

Five Casino Groups: Ownership and UK Licence Checks

A casino group can mean a corporate owner, a licensed operating company or a network of brands using a shared platform. Those are different relationships. Knowing which one a directory is describing helps you check who holds your account and whether a proposed sister site really belongs in the same comparison.

This guide uses five examples: Flutter, Entain, evoke, Jumpman Gaming and Skill On Net. They illustrate different ownership structures; their order is not a rating for payouts, safety, service or value. Corporate brand lists and Gambling Commission records were consulted on 9 September 2026.

Corporate ownership and an operating licence answer different questions

The corporate parent tells you which wider business owns a brand. The legal operator in the account terms tells you which company is providing the gambling service. The regulator’s record then shows that company’s permissions and the domain names associated with it.

Two casinos can share a parent while using different licensed subsidiaries. Two sites can use the same software supplier without sharing an owner. There is no reliable shortcut based on matching three website features, a game library or a payment logo.

1. Flutter: a corporate portfolio with several familiar brands

Flutter’s published portfolio includes Paddy Power, Betfair, Sky Betting & Gaming, PokerStars and tombola. This is evidence of a wider corporate relationship. It does not establish that every product is supplied by the same legal company or uses one interchangeable account.

For a practical comparison, take the exact casino domain, open its terms and identify the operating company for the gambling product you mean. A brand can offer casino, bingo and betting products, so a licence attached to one activity is not sufficient evidence for another.

Sources: Flutter’s brand portfolio and its first-quarter 2026 factsheet. Start individual research with our Paddy Power or Betfair profile.

2. Entain: check the subsidiary behind each brand

Entain’s own materials identify Ladbrokes, Coral, Gala and Foxy among its brands. That corporate connection is a useful starting point for a sister-site investigation. The next step is to read the legal entity and domain record for each individual service.

Do not turn a corporate brand list into a promise that identity checks, support teams, account balances or promotion eligibility are identical everywhere in the group. Those are operational questions to answer from the applicable account terms.

Sources: Entain’s brand list and its UK group information. Our Foxy Bingo profile provides a brand-specific starting point.

3. evoke: distinguish the group name from the casino contract

evoke’s published brand portfolio includes William Hill, 888casino, 888sport, 888poker and Mr Green. A reader researching one of these names should still establish the operator for the exact domain and location involved.

A common group name does not make a promotional offer transferable. Nor does it establish that an overseas version of a brand has the same regulatory arrangements as the version serving Great Britain. Keep the country-specific terms with the evidence for that profile.

Source: evoke’s corporate brand portfolio. Compare it with the legal company in the casino’s terms and the Commission’s business register.

4. Jumpman Gaming: work from the exact licence and domain list

The Commission lists Jumpman Gaming Limited under account 39175, with active remote casino and bingo permissions at the check date. This identifies the licensed business; it does not mean every domain ever associated with Jumpman is currently open.

Use the register’s domain-name entries to check the exact spelling and status. A white-label entry describes a relationship to the licensee. An inactive entry is historical evidence and should not be presented as a current casino recommendation.

Source: Jumpman Gaming’s licence summary. The site’s brand database can help locate a profile, but the register and current terms remain the sources to confirm it.

5. Skill On Net: use account 39326 for the UK licence check

The Commission lists Skill On Net Limited under account 39326, with active remote casino, bingo and gambling-software permissions at the check date. The legal spelling in the register is useful when a casino’s branding uses the combined name SkillOnNet.

Check the relevant domain entry and the operator named in that site’s terms. Shared platform features alone do not prove that another casino has the same licence or owner. An international licence mentioned in a footer also needs to be distinguished from the company’s Great Britain permissions.

Source: Skill On Net’s licence summary.

A short evidence sheet for comparing two sister sites

  1. Write down both exact domains, including any country-specific version.
  2. Record the legal operator from each site’s current account terms.
  3. Match the operator, permission and domain status in the relevant register.
  4. Record a shared corporate parent separately from a shared operating licence.
  5. Read the account, withdrawal, bonus and self-exclusion terms instead of inferring them from ownership.
  6. Keep the source address and date. If the sources disagree, leave the relationship unresolved until the operator or regulator clarifies it.

Account restrictions are not a reason to search for a workaround

If a restriction or exclusion applies to your gambling, moving between related brands is not a sound way to address it. Ask the operator to explain the scope of the restriction. Our responsible gambling guide links to support and self-exclusion information.

For wider research, use the sister-site directory, read how our evidence is assessed, or return to the ownership and account guides.